Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mask Trilogy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NOQUORUM applies. ✗plicit 00:24, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mask Trilogy

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Each game already has their own wiki page. No need to create a separate page just to say there are 3 of them. Imcdc (talk) 03:45, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Imcdc (talk) 03:45, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as disambiguation. While it doesn't seem there is any coverage of the "trilogy" themselves, it would aid in navigation to the elements of the trilogy, and thus meets the requirements of being a disambiguation page. BilledMammal (talk) 11:48, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I am not objecting to making this into a standard disambig, but I think first we need a more reliable source that this is even called that; right now all we have is a board game fan wiki. Otherwise, this is ORish. Sadly there is no good redirect target... --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:04, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fair point; I think I found one here. I am a little surprised that a website dedicated solely to board games can be a reliable source, but looking at its "about us" page it appears to be so. It's not enough for an article, but in addition to the non-reliable sources, I think it's enough to demonstrate that a disambiguation page would be a useful navigation aid. BilledMammal (talk) 09:49, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:31, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:01, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.